Presentation Material
Abstract
Bug bounty programs are a hot topic these days. More and more companies are realizing the benefits of running a program, and researchers are jumping at the opportunity to grab some swag and make some extra cash from the bugs they find. Reporting security issues has never been as easy, open, and risk-free as it is right now. Everybody wins!
Though that doesn’t mean we should stop there. As researchers, we spend a lot of time doing the same menial tasks for each program: monitoring for new targets, checking for common issues, remembering just which flags you needed to pass to that tool (or even which tool is best for that job). We build new tools, hack together shell scripts, and generally make small incremental changes to our process. But surely there’s a better approach?
Are you sick of repeating the same tedious tasks over and over? Wouldn’t it be nice to have your own bug hunting machine? One that -
Is always watching Reacts as soon as a new target becomes available Takes care of those tedious repetitive steps for you Makes life easy when you want to integrate a new tool/workflow Doesn’t cost the world to run, and trivially scales Leverages lessons and technologies battle tested in the dev world to improve your offensive capacity, capability and productivity Monitors your own infrastructure and reacts before hackers can (while saving you the cost of those Bug Bounty payouts in the meantime)
We call this approach Bug Bounty Hunting on Steroids. We will discuss our research and approach to building such a machine, sharing some of the lessons we learned along the way.
AI Generated Summarymay contain errors
I’ll do my best to summarize this content for you. Please note that the text appears to be a transcript of a speech or presentation, and it’s quite challenging to follow due to its informal tone, various tangents, and lack of clear structure.
From what I can gather, the speaker seems to be discussing a project or system they’ve been working on for about two years. The project involves defining tools, workflows, and conventions, with a focus on making things easy to use and efficient. They mention using containers, specifying inputs and outputs, and having multiple workers perform tasks.
The speaker also touches on the idea of keeping input “starter fluid” so that the output generated becomes the new input, creating a continuous process. They mention different workforces, slack channels, and validation processes.
Additionally, the speaker appears to be sharing their experiences, lessons learned, and insights from working on this project. They emphasize the importance of simplicity, extensibility, collaboration, and not being afraid to try new things.
However, it’s essential to note that the content is quite vague, and without more context or specific details, it’s challenging to provide a concise and accurate summary.